No argument that electricity you have on board thru an alternator can make hydrogen. Dammit - the alternator uses more energy to make hydrogen which is power loss to the engine then using the fuel to make electricity directly to propell the car. No free lunch out there. You are being fooled if you think running an alternator is free electricity.
Just feel the load when you turn on headlights, jump start a dead battery in another vehicle etc., etc.
If you have charged the battery with yet another means like a home battery charger you might notice an efficiency increase short term which was just what was lost to make that electricity to begin with - hydro- electric, coal, diesel, nukes, solar - whatever.
If you capture WASTE somewhere and use that energy to make hydrogen when it would otherwise be lost then you have something. Nice transportable fuel - explosive as it is!
This is to say we should use electricty to pump water back on top of the dam to create MORE energy than it took to put it back up! WRONG! They do in fact do that in times when the electricty demand is less than what is produced and run the water again - a net loss but did capture what would have been a lost.
The big lost opportunity in motor vehicles the "burn" a fuel is HEAT. technology has done well with friction. Power to propell is perhaps only half of the energy available. So far that's about the best mankind can do. Keep thinking, more can be done.
********************
It's a myth folks - no chance this is captured loss using a battery in a vehicle. If that was so then why not use this free hydrogen to make even more hydrogen and end the world's energy needs. Dosn't work that way does it?
"For every action there is a an equal and opposite reaction"- Issac Newton..... read it. Guy knew his stuff before his time and theory has never failed.
The hurdle "Du Jour" is battery technology. They weigh too much for what they carry and can supply. A tractor trailer (electric) with a cargo of batteries can't carry charged batteries to a desination for use without consuming up all the charge! Imagine that truck leaving New York for LA with a load of 10,000 gallons of fossile fuel vs charged batteries to deliver. They each use their cargo to propell them and the 10,000 gals loses 1,000 to arrive leaving off 90% of the engergy. The battery truck didn't make it carrying the weight of the batteries alone killed it before it got there!
We are experiencing an energy crisis with the cost of it doubling as it did in 1973 and again in the late 70s. The myths abounded then too. If there was a simple way to get out of this problem then the big three car makers would be doing it now and retrofitting an entire fleet so they won't be going out of business like is possible this time.
Save your money folks on this trick but keep thinking.....
Tom Greenleaf
_________________________________________
Tom Greenleaf - MetroWest, Boston
(This post was edited by Tom Greenleaf on Jul 31, 2008, 10:56 PM)